“Plugging
the Energy Gap” the December 2011 policy document from the London Assembly
Environment Committee, indicates that delays or cancellations to energy
development projects could result in energy demand outstripping supply by as
early as 2015. Without new projects
coming on-line, demand will exceed supply by 2020.
Many old nuclear power stations are due to be decommissioned
by 2020 (7.1 GW) and most coal-fuelled (carbon intensive) power stations (12
GW) are due to be shut down between 2012 and 2016. A new nuclear power station takes 10 years to
build, (excluding planning), so even if a project were started now, they
wouldn’t make the 2020 deadline.
The anticipated investment required in infrastructure, to
deliver low carbon electricity by energy companies is around £200bn – more than
twice the investment made over the last decade.
If energy generators choose not to make investments, taxes such as the
Carbon Price Floor (as a result of generating companies continuing to use
carbon-intensive fuel) will still impact their bottom line.
The implications for the consumer are clear, with increasing
energy prices as investment costs are passed on, (one Guardian
article suggests rises in domestic energy bills of between 23% and 52%), power
outages or mains voltage reductions, particularly at peak times.
So what is it that
organisations are doing to manage the future risk of energy security?
Andrew
Winston @GreenAdvantage highlights Walmart’s commitment to 100% renewable
energy and how they use a longer term view on payback (i.e. helping the solar
market get to scale, thereby lowering future costs). Immediate benefits include the experience and
knowledge gained by their managers of optimising new power sources alongside the
immediate cost benefits.
However the Siemens’ Green
League Report suggests that 70% of the 600 companies in their study view
cost reduction as the primary reason to tackle energy management. This would suggest that the implications of
the impending energy gap are not on the radar of a large majority of
organisations. Does this represent a
lack of knowledge or awareness and/or a lack of the long-term view taken by the
likes of Walmart?
A recent UN-backed
study by GlobeScan and SustainAbility supports the view that the critical
barrier to businesses’ transition to Sustainabilty is Financial short-termism. 51% of corporate respondents cited a low
awareness of the business imperative.
So whilst many B-to-C companies are driving initiatives to
reduce their CO2 emissions; (and those within their supply chain); management
of the business risk of future energy security does not appear to have an
owner. Where should this responsibility
sit? Pepsico and other leading organisations
believe ownership for driving a sustainable business should sit in the
Boardroom. More on the role of
leadership next time…
No comments:
Post a Comment